Cambodia-Thailand Conflict

Introduction

The Cambodia-Thailand conflict, as of July 2025, represents a multifaceted crisis rooted in a historical border dispute that has escalated into a significant diplomatic, economic, and cultural standoff. The conflict, centered on undemarcated sections of the 820-km border, particularly the Emerald Triangle where Cambodia, Thailand, and Laos converge, has been reignited by a deadly clash on May 28, 2025, which resulted in the death of a Cambodian soldier. This incident, coupled with a leaked phone call between Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, has brought bilateral relations to their lowest point in over a decade. This report examines the historical context, recent developments, diplomatic efforts, economic impacts, cultural dimensions, political repercussions, and potential resolutions, highlighting the broader implications for Southeast Asian stability.

Historical Background

The Cambodia-Thailand border dispute originates from a 1907 French colonial map, which Cambodia uses to assert territorial claims, while Thailand argues it is inaccurate. A pivotal issue is the Preah Vihear temple, a UNESCO World Heritage site awarded to Cambodia by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1962, with the ruling reaffirmed in 2013. Past clashes, such as one in 2011 near the temple, resulted in at least 20 deaths and displaced thousands. Other disputed areas, including the Ta Moan temple complex and the Emerald Triangle, remain contentious due to unclear demarcation. The establishment of a joint boundary committee in 2000 aimed to address these issues but has made limited progress.

Beyond territorial disputes, cultural rivalries have fueled tensions. Both nations claim ownership of shared heritage, such as kickboxing (kun Khmer vs. muay Thai), traditional masked dance (Lakhon Khol vs. khon), and culinary traditions. Historical incidents, like the 2003 riots in Phnom Penh over a Thai actress’s claim that Angkor Wat belonged to Thailand, led to the destruction of the Thai Embassy and severed diplomatic ties. These cultural disputes, rooted in historical enmity from competing empires and exacerbated by Cambodia’s developmental challenges post-Khmer Rouge, continue to shape the conflict.

Historical Event	Year	Details	Impact
French Colonial Map	1907	Defined Cambodia-Thailand border, contested by Thailand	Root of ongoing territorial disputes
ICJ Ruling on Preah Vihear	1962	Awarded temple to Cambodia	Persistent tensions over surrounding land
Angkor Wat Dispute	2003	Thai actress’s claim led to riots in Phnom Penh	Thai Embassy destroyed, diplomatic relations severed
Preah Vihear Clash	2011	Military confrontation near temple	~20 deaths, thousands displaced
SEA Games Kickboxing Dispute	2023	Naming event “Kun Khmer” sparked Thai outrage	Heightened nationalist tensions

Recent Developments (2025)

The current escalation began on May 28, 2025, in the Chong Bok area of Ubon Ratchathani Province, near the Emerald Triangle. Thai soldiers encountered Cambodian troops allegedly digging trenches in a disputed area, leading to a brief firefight that killed one Cambodian soldier. Both nations claim self-defense, with Cambodia accusing Thailand of violating its sovereignty through drone flights and troop deployments, and Thailand alleging Cambodian encroachment. In response, both countries reinforced their military presence along the border.

Thailand imposed strict border restrictions, limiting crossings to essential travelers (e.g., students, medical patients), stranding tourists and disrupting commerce. Cambodia retaliated with economic measures, including bans on Thai fruit and vegetable imports, fuel imports, Thai media (movies and TV dramas), and cross-border internet links. On June 15, 2025, a leaked phone call between Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen intensified tensions. In the call, Paetongtarn referred to Hun Sen as “uncle,” criticized a Thai military commander as an “opponent,” and offered to manage his requests. The leak led to domestic backlash in Thailand, with critics arguing it compromised national interests. Paetongtarn apologized, claiming it was a negotiating tactic, but the incident has deepened mistrust.

Event	Date	Details	Outcome
Border Clash	May 28, 2025	Firefight in Chong Bok area, Emerald Triangle	One Cambodian soldier killed, military buildup
Leaked Phone Call	June 15, 2025	Paetongtarn-Hun Sen conversation leaked	Political turmoil in Thailand, strained relations
Border Restrictions	June 2025	Thailand limits crossings, Cambodia bans Thai imports	Disrupted trade, tourism, and bilateral ties

Diplomatic Efforts

Diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict face significant challenges due to differing approaches. Cambodia filed a request with the ICJ on June 15, 2025, seeking a ruling on disputed border areas, citing the 1962 Preah Vihear precedent. Thailand, however, rejects ICJ jurisdiction, preferring bilateral negotiations through the joint boundary committee established in 2000. Bilateral talks held in June 2025 failed to de-escalate tensions, with Cambodia rejecting Thailand’s proposals. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), of which both countries are members, has a mandate to promote peaceful dispute resolution under its charter. However, ASEAN’s consensus-based approach and preference for quiet diplomacy have limited its effectiveness, and it has not yet intervened significantly. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim offered personal mediation, having spoken with both Paetongtarn Shinawatra and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet, but broader ASEAN action remains elusive.

Diplomatic Effort	Details	Status
ICJ Request	Cambodia seeks ruling on disputed areas (June 2025)	Thailand rejects ICJ jurisdiction
Bilateral Talks	Joint committee negotiations (June 2025)	Failed to de-escalate
ASEAN Role	Expected to mediate per charter	Limited action, consensus-based approach hinders progress
Malaysian Mediation	PM Anwar Ibrahim offers to mediate	Preliminary discussions, no resolution

Economic Impacts

The conflict has disrupted economic ties between Cambodia and Thailand, with significant impacts on trade, tourism, and local livelihoods. In 2024, border trade was valued at over $5 billion, with Thailand holding a $3 billion surplus. Thailand’s border closures, particularly at the Aranyaprathet-Poipet crossing, have disrupted this trade, stranding traders and affecting local economies. Cambodia’s retaliatory measures, including bans on Thai fruit, vegetables, fuel, and media, have further strained economic relations. Approximately 500,000 to 1,000,000 Cambodian migrant workers in Thailand, vital to agriculture and construction, face uncertainty, with potential return pressures adding economic strain.

Tourism, a major economic driver for both nations, has been severely impacted. Thailand’s closure of land crossings has disrupted travel to Cambodian cultural sites like Angkor Wat, forcing tourists to take expensive flights or reroutes, deterring budget travelers. This has harmed Thailand’s tourism sector, a key economic pillar, and damaged its image as a reliable destination. Cambodia’s cyber-scam centers, generating up to $12.5 billion annually (half its GDP), have become a point of contention, with Thailand tightening border security and halting fuel and electricity exports to combat these operations.

Economic Aspect	Impact	Details
Border Trade	Disrupted	Over $5 billion in 2024, affected by closures and bans
Tourism	Severe decline	Closure of Aranyaprathet-Poipet crossing impacts Angkor Wat travel
Migrant Workers	Uncertainty	500,000–1,000,000 Cambodians in Thailand face potential return
Cyber-Scam Centers	Contention	Thailand halts fuel/electricity exports to combat $12.5 billion industry

Cultural and Nationalistic Aspects

Cultural disputes are a significant driver of the conflict, intertwined with territorial claims and nationalist sentiments. Both nations share cultural elements like Theravada Buddhism, kickboxing, and traditional dance, but disputes over ownership have fueled tensions. Historical incidents include the 2003 Angkor Wat riots, sparked by a Thai actress’s claim, and the 2008 Preah Vihear dispute, which led to military confrontations. In 2023, naming a SEA Games kickboxing event “Kun Khmer” provoked Thai outrage, highlighting ongoing rivalries. In 2025, Cambodia’s ban on Thai media reflects these cultural tensions. Public sentiment is highly nationalistic, particularly in Cambodia, where a June 18, 2025, rally in Phnom Penh saw thousands chanting “Cambodia’s land! We won’t take others’ land, we keep our land!” In Thailand, the leaked phone call has fueled protests, with critics accusing Paetongtarn of undermining national sovereignty.

Political Repercussions

The conflict has significant political consequences, particularly in Thailand. The leaked phone call led to the withdrawal of the Bhumjaithai party from the governing coalition and protests demanding Paetongtarn Shinawatra’s resignation. On July 1, 2025, Thailand’s Constitutional Court suspended Paetongtarn pending an ethics investigation, destabilizing the government. In Cambodia, Prime Minister Hun Manet, supported by his father Hun Sen (now Senate President), has leveraged nationalist sentiment to strengthen his position. Hun Sen’s influence and his role in the leaked call have added complexity to the diplomatic standoff. The interplay between domestic politics and international relations underscores the challenges of managing the crisis amidst nationalist pressures.

Political Event	Country	Details	Impact
Paetongtarn Suspension	Thailand	Suspended by Constitutional Court (July 1, 2025)	Political instability, coalition collapse
Bhumjaithai Withdrawal	Thailand	Left coalition over leaked call	Weakened government, protests
Nationalist Rally	Cambodia	Phnom Penh rally (June 18, 2025)	Strengthened Hun Manet’s position

Potential Resolutions

Resolving the Cambodia-Thailand conflict requires addressing its territorial, cultural, and political dimensions. Legal avenues, such as ICJ intervention, are complicated by Thailand’s rejection of ICJ jurisdiction. Bilateral negotiations through the joint committee offer a potential path but are stalled by mistrust. Third-party mediation, possibly through ASEAN or neutral countries like Malaysia, could facilitate dialogue, but ASEAN’s consensus-driven approach limits its effectiveness. Military de-escalation, such as withdrawing troops to previously agreed positions, could reduce tensions. Cultural disputes could be addressed through UNESCO to promote shared heritage. A sustainable resolution will require addressing historical grievances, managing nationalist sentiments, and fostering economic cooperation.

Conclusion

The Cambodia-Thailand conflict of 2025 is a complex crisis driven by historical border disputes, cultural rivalries, and nationalist sentiments. The May 2025 clash, retaliatory measures, and the leaked phone call have strained relations, disrupted trade and tourism, and destabilized Thai politics. Diplomatic efforts, including ASEAN mediation, face challenges, but a combination of legal, diplomatic, and cultural initiatives could pave the way for resolution. The conflict’s outcome will have significant implications for Southeast Asian stability, highlighting the need for cooperative solutions in a region striving for unity.

Citations:

Search This Blog

I Shear